Archive for the ‘Rant’ category

PISSED OFF about Inadequate US Energy Policy?

June 5, 2008

If you’re not going to read the message below… Here’s the take away… The US oil companies aren’t the price gouging bastards they’re made out to be. They’re making less than the government on each gallon of gasoline or diesel sold. Congress ought to look in the mirror and fess up… The Government is the one taking the bigger chunk of money out of your and my pockets. Didn’t we wage a massive, years long war against The Crown for some of this same crap? [EDIT: Maybe I’m just a dumb public school educated guy who doesn’t remember the rewrite of history correctly… hmm?]

So, are you good and mad? As well you should be. Are you ready to do something about it? While our congress does next to nothing to put an effective, blended US energy policy together they manage to pass things like the “National Do Not Call” legislation at flank speed. WTF!? That’s messed up!

Folks there’s no doubt… our elected leaders do some real good. But, too often they seem to come up lacking when we’re in a Fourth and Goal situation. Why can’t we, as a nation, convert this play? It’s beyond me. It’s beyond irresponsible. It’s reckless in this case. And, it’s maddening.

The US citizenry deserve a comprehensive Energy Policy. And, I’m not talking solely about oil and gas independence. There are renewables to develop. There are greener solutions to invent and bring to market. There are all kinds of thermal solutions to explore. Not to mention nuclear and H3 alternatives. But, I will focus on O&G exploration as that’s what I know a bit about. As a nation we are actively barring exploration in regions which would yield massive amounts of highly recoverable crude and gas. We know where it is. On the map there’s the equivalent of a big “drill here” marker. Yet, legislation and special interests keep those areas off limits, out of bounds and untouchable.

This is unacceptable from national security and fiduciarily responsible points of view.

I hope you’ll take a moment to read the message my friend Roger forwarded me. I’ve wondered for months what my 1,000th post would be. I’ve tried hard to provide an educational and entertaining blog over the years on a variety of things mostly geared to Apple stuff. I do love Apple. But, given all the things I’m most passionate about… There are few things I’m more “red-assed” about than what the US government has become and what appears to be self-serving tendencies particularly when they so brazenly posture to take profits out of US corporations (the same ones they readily accept campaign contributions from I might point out) and NEVER perform the more important and telling self-examination. If they did this they’d find the REAL inconvenient truth… they’re more culpable in the price gouging than the oil companies. It’s high time we educate ourselves on these matters and take our state and nations capitals to task.

May 21, 2008

Earlier today, the Senate Judiciary Committee summoned top executives from the petroleum industry for what Chairman Pat Leahy thought would be a politically profitable inquisition. Leahy and his comrades showed up ready to blame American oil compani es for the high price of gasoline, but the event wasn’t as satisfactory as the Democrats had hoped.

The industry lineup was formidable:
. Robert Malone, Chairman and President of BP America, Inc.;
. John Hofmeister, President, Shell Oil Company;
. Peter Robertson, Vice Chairman of the Board, Chevron Corporation;
. John Lowe, Executive Vice President, Conoco Philips Company; and
. Stephen Simon, Senior Vice President, Exxon Mobil Corporation.

Not surprisingly, the petroleum executives stole the show, as they were far smarter, infinitely better informed, and much more public-spirited than the Senate Democrats.

One theme that emerged from the hearing was the surprisingly small role played by American oil companies in the global petroleum market.

John Lowe pointed out:
I cannot overemphasize the access issue. Access to resources is severely restricted in the United States and abroad, and the American oil industry must compete with national oil companies who are often much larger and have the support of their governments.

We can only compete directly for 7 percent of the world’s available reserves while about 75 percent is completely controlled by national oil companies and is not accessible.

Stephen Simon amplified:
Exxon Mobil is the larg est U.S. oil and gas company, but we account for only 2 percent of global energy production, only 3 percent of global oil production, only 6 percent of global refining capacity, and only 1 percent of global petroleum reserves. With respect to petroleum reserves, we rank 14th. Government-owned national oil companies dominate the top spots. For an American company to succeed in this competitive landscape and go head to head with huge government-backed national oil companies, it needs financial strength and scale to execute massive complex energy projects requiring enormous long-term investments.

To simply maintain our current operations and make needed capital investments, Exxon Mobil spends nearly $1 billion each day.

Because foreign companies and governments control the overwhelming majority of the world’s oil, most of the price you pay at the pump is the cost paid by the American oil company to acquire crude oil from someone else.

Last year, the average price in the United States of a gallon of regular unleaded gasoline was around $2.80. On average in 2007, approximately 58 percent of the price reflected the amount paid for crude oil. Consumers pay for that crude oil, and so do we.

Of the 2 million barrels per day Exxon Mobil refined in 2007 here in the United States, 90 percent were purchased from others.

Another theme of the day’s testimony was that, if anyone is “gouging” consumers through the high price of gasoline, it is federal and state governments, not American oil companies. On the average, 15% percent of the cost of gasoline at the pump goes for taxes, while only 4% represents oil company profits. These figures were repeated several times, but, strangely, not a single Democratic Senator proposed relieving consumers’ anxieties about gas prices by reducing taxes.

The last theme that was sounded repeatedly was Congress’s responsibility for the fact that American companies have access to so little petroleum.

Shell’s John Hofmeister explained, eloquently:
While all oil-importing nations buy oil at global prices, some, notably India and China, subsidize the cost of oil products to their nation’s consumers, feeding the demand for more oil despite record prices. They do this to speed economic growth and to ensure a competitive advantage relative to other nations.

Meanwhile, in the United States, access to our own oil and gas resources has been limited for the last 30 years, prohibiting companies such as Shell from exploring and developing resources for the benefit of the American people.

Senator Sessions, I agree, it is not a free market.

According to the Department of the Interior, 62 percent of all on-shore fed eral lands are off limits to oil and gas developments, with restrictions applying to 92 percent of all federal lands. We have an outer continental shelf moratorium on the Atlantic Ocean, an outer continental shelf moratorium on the Pacific Ocean, an outer continental shelf moratorium on the eastern Gulf of Mexico, congressional bans on on-shore oil and gas activities in specific areas of the Rockies and Alaska, and even a congressional ban on doing an analysis of the resource potential for oil and gas in the Atlantic, Pacific and eastern Gulf of Mexico.

The Argonne National Laboratory did a report in 2004 that identified 40 specific federal policy areas that halt, limit, delay or restrict natural gas projects. I urge you to review it. It is a long list. If I may, I offer it today if you would like to include it in the record.

When many of these policies were implemented, oil was selling in the single digits, not the triple digits we se e now. The cumulative effect of these policies has been to discourage U.S. investment and send U.S. companies outside the United States to produce new supplies.

As a result, U.S. production has declined so much that nearly 60 percent of daily consumption comes from foreign sources.
The problem of access can be solved in this country by the same government that has prohibited it. Congress could have chosen to lift some or all of the current restrictions on exploration and production of oil and gas. Congress could provide national policy to reverse the persistent decline of domestically secure natural resource development.

Later in the hearing, Senator Orrin Hatch walked Hofmeister through the Democrats’ latest efforts to block energy independence:

HATCH: I want to get into that. In other words, we’re talking about Utah, Colorado and Wyoming. It’s fair to say that they’re not considered part of America’s $22 billion of proven reserves.

HOFMEISTER: Not at all.

HATCH: No, but experts agree that there’s between 800 billion to almost 2 trillion barrels of oil that could be recoverable there, and that’s good oil, isn’t it?

HOFMEISTER: That’s correct.

HATCH: It could be recovered at somewhere between $30 and $40 a barrel?

HOFMEISTER: I think those costs are probably a bit dated now, based upon what we’ve seen in the inflation…

HATCH: Well, somewhere in that area.

HOFMEISTER: I don’t know what the exact cost would be, but, you know, if there is more supply, I think inflation in the oil industry would be cracked. And we are facing severe inflation because of the limited amount of supply against the demand.

HATCH: I guess what I’m saying, though, is that if we started to develop the oil shale in those three states we could do it within this framework of over $100 a barrel and make a profit.

HOFMEISTER: I believe we could.

HATCH: And we could help our country alleviate its oil pressures.

HOFMEISTER: Yes.

HATCH: But they’re stopping us from doing that right here, as we sit here. We just had a hearing last week where Democrats had stopped the ability to do that, in at least Colorado.

HOFMEISTER: Well, as I said in my opening statement, I think the public policy constraints on the supply side in this country are a disservice to the American consumer.

The committee’s Democrats attempted no response. They know that they are largely responsible for the current high price of gasoline, and they want the price to rise even further. Consequently, they have no intention of permitting the development of domestic oil and gas reserves that would both increase this country’s energy independence and give consumers a break from constantly increasing energy costs.

Every once in a while, Congressional hearings turn ou t to be informative.

Ford’s In Overdrive To Oblivion

January 14, 2008

What is it with American companies?! Sears stopped giving a rip (experienced that firsthand) and now Cory Doctorow is bringing to light Ford’s clamping down on their enthusiasts taking pictures of their Ford cars for publication in a calendar. Think the number 3 car maker in the world has a crummy policy like this? Kind of doubt it.

So, OK, I loosely understand Ford’s rights here. Still, how does that further their brand with the self-same rabid people who love the Ford branded stuff they own? Guy Kawasaki’s books have long suggested “Let a thousand flowers bloom.” or something to that effect. Ford’s not doing themselves any favors. Apple has the same rights. They not nutballs to this order. No way. They know how to harness their fan base.

When I do, eventually, buy that 2+2 Fastback Mustang I’ve been jonesing on for so many years… Bet your ass I’m going to photo the beast. Inside, outside, closeups, pano’s. I’ll publish them on my blog, my dot mac gallery, and every other place I can fathom. Ford might as well send me that cease and desist now. It could be just then thing to respark my love affair with a certain RS Camaro.

Props to Cory’s fine writin’ and LoudMouthMan’s lead.

Gizmodo’s CES Prank

January 10, 2008

Excessive. Childish. Funny. The last straw?

[FINAL: I’ve unsubscribed from Gizmodo’s feeds and hope you’ll consider it too. Their advertisers should impress the message upon Gizmodo if we can’t seem to get through.]

[EDIT: OK, I’ve had time to digest it… and while it’s still gets me to chuckle (I’m shaking my head in disbelief as it’s happening)… it’s more dangerous (intentionally strongly worded) and damaging than anything. What was done is being termed corporate sabotage and seems to me to be a term worthy of the act. What Gizmodo has done is to wantonly cause potentially serious harm to those they chose to victimize. Judie has posted an interesting point of view on the financial side of the stunt. If you’re Motorola or Sony or some other corporation spending large sums of money to attract the press and consumers to your exhibit only to be INTENTIONALLY sabotaged during your presentations… It won’t take a judge too very long to see there is a case here. It won’t take a jury too very long to see there are damages. It won’t take Gizmodo very long to backpedal and fire/suspend/reprimand the folks who did this.

Now, I also recall Robert Scoble drawing our attention to the fact this was going to happen and telling people to cover their IR ports. Can’t recall if he blogged it or commented it somewhere. Good for Robert raising the alert. Too bad it wasn’t heeded and acted upon in a larger way. Wish I had the foresight to call the CES pipe and drape decorators and suggest they take some serious preventative action. We live and we learn.]

Seige Politics

January 10, 2008

Just read a fine posting from Fred Wilson (aka A VC) on the New Hampshire primaries. I love politics and dislike politicians (I think that’s a Will Rogers quote) and have kept up with the pre-caucaus ruckus with a half-interested eye until this past week. Now I’m fully engaged.

If one thing came out of Iowa and New Hampshire it’s this: The race is wide open for all parties with the Democratic candidates looking a bit more strong on the electability side of things. But, there is no runaway frontrunner. Which is terrific. It means they’re going to have to take positions and really unlace the gloves and earn the votes. As it should be.

I’ve often wondered why it is a Senator, General or a Governor is most likely to run and win a Presidential campaign. I suppose they have the organizational experience, know the ropes and have access to the big money. Same reason an inexperienced schmo isn’t going to up and run GE tomorrow morning (Sears maybe): Experience.

I guess those days stopped long ago. Wouldn’t it be nice if a regular old citizen who has EXPERIENCE with being an American registered to run and simply sat on the sidelines waiting for a Fred Thompson or a Richardson to drop out and then come in and earn the election. Someone who didn’t play by the rules of the Primaries and Caucauses (I know I’m spelling that incorrectly, sorry).

Fred’s mentioned a couple of times how Bloomberg would be a fantastic pres. I’d go for that in an instant.

Christmas-2, Kwanza-0

November 1, 2007

Turned on the tellie (Lloyd, you’ve spoilt my otherwise perfectly workable President’s English) only to find two back to back Christmas themed adverts. The Overstock.com ad with the pretty lady in a red dress trimmed with white and a kids toy commercial. I’ve not yet seen the Kwanza ads. ;)Who decides the timing of these ads!? Never mind. I know the type… the account exec and the media planner ran the numbers and it still pays out. Before long Valentine’s Day will be the line of demarcation. Feb. 15 might very well become the biggest shopping day of the year.  (It is a pay day after all.)

Unusually Optimistic For A Monday

October 15, 2007

Something’s different today. Monday’s are normally lousy from the get go. But, not today… for some reason.

Nothing out of the ordinary happened this weekend. Renovations on the kitchen continued for the Nth straight week. Otherwise, worked on Grocio projects.

There’s something different about today. Will be interesting to see if intuition is correct or if the coffee was somehow sabotaged with too much optimism while brewing as the office coffee is unusually good today too.

Weird.

Open Letter To The Guardian… Leopard.

September 20, 2007

Leopard-Guardian

I’m calling BS on this article!

Fully 64-bit. HTML email. Tighter UI. Don’t even get me started on Leopard Server (holy mother of God!). Just wait until you see what’s possible on the application side of things (tip: Watch Delicious Monster’s announcement in October).

I bet Charles Arthur couldn’t cite the top two innovations from the upgrade from Panther to Tiger! Let alone the “average user.” So, don’t gauge it on that! That’s just a poor, poor approach to the thing. My blogging on Leopard is getting a TON more interest [than] Tiger and Panther ever did. So, while he might score points on “Yeah, you’re TECHNICALLY right.” There are a LOT of people out there excited something (ie. ANYTHING) new is coming down the pike.

Charles… you need it. You just don’t realize it yet. (BTW, how did a non ‘early adopter’ get the gig for writing drivel like this for The Guardian’s Technology Section?

Gerald Buckley
https://gwhiz.wordpress.com/

[EDIT: Anyone feel like serving up The Guardian a heaping shovel full of haggis? Here’s their email addy tech@guardian.co.uk ]